首页> 外文OA文献 >A Cross- country study of the effect of institutional ownership on credit ratings
【2h】

A Cross- country study of the effect of institutional ownership on credit ratings

机译:关于机构所有权对信用评级影响的跨国研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A considerable number of studies have examined the relationship between corporate governance (CG) structures and corporate performance (e.g., Yermack, 1996; Gompers et al., 2003; Beiner et al., 2006; Renders et al., 2010; Ntim et al., 2012; Kumar & Zattoni 2013; Griffin, et al., 2014). In contrast, despite its importance as demonstrated by the recent financial crisis, studies examining why and how a corporation\u2019s CG mechanisms might influence its credit ratings are rare (e.g., Switzer and Wang, 2013;Matthies, 2013; Tran, 2014). This research, therefore, seeks to contribute to the extant literature by exploring the effects of (CG) mechanisms on corporate credit ratings. Specifically, using a sample of 200 firms from 10 OECD countries over ten years covering the pre- and post-2007/08 global financial crisis period from Anglo American (i.e., Australia, Canada, Ireland, UK, and US) and Continental European (i.e., France, Germany, Italy, Japan and Spain) traditions and employing a total of 200 listed companies, this paper hopes to achieve a number of objectives. First, the paper attempted to assess the levels of compliance with, and disclosure of, CG principles contained in the 2004 OECD CG Code in firms from two different traditions: Anglo America and Continental Europe. Second, the paper sought to investigate the relationship between CG mechanisms and credit ratings. These relationships will be explored by employing firm-level CG mechanisms (ownership structures measured by Institutional Ownership) by accounting for firm-level control variables (e.g., firm size, growth, profitability, and leverage) based on a multi-theoretical framework that incorporates insights from agency and legitimacy theories. The findings revealed that there was a strong negative relationship between institutional ownership and credit ratings. From the descriptive analysis, it was shown that institutional owners did not have a very high credit rating. When the control variables were assessed, it was shown that they had a negative influence on the credit ratings with sales growth and leverage and positive significant relationship with firm size, corruption index, power distance and Anglo American countries.
机译:大量研究已经研究了公司治理结构与公司绩效之间的关系(例如,Yermack,1996; Gompers等,2003; Beiner等,2006; Renders等,2010; Ntim等。 ,2012; Kumar&Zattoni,2013; Griffin等,2014)。相比之下,尽管最近一次金融危机证明了它的重要性,但研究企业的CG机制为何以及如何影响其信用评级的研究很少(例如Switzer和Wang,2013年; Matthies,2013年; Tran,2014年)。因此,本研究旨在通过探索(CG)机制对公司信用评级的影响,为现有文献做出贡献。具体而言,我们使用了来自英美资源集团(即澳大利亚,加拿大,爱尔兰,英国和美国)和欧洲大陆(2007/08年全球金融危机之前和之后)在10年内来自10个经合组织国家的200家公司的样本, (例如法国,德国,意大利,日本和西班牙)的传统,总共雇用了200家上市公司,本文希望实现许多目标。首先,本文试图评估来自两种不同传统的公司(英美和欧洲大陆)对2004年经合组织企业管治守则所包含的企业管治原则的遵守程度和披露水平。其次,本文试图研究企业管治机制与信用评级之间的关系。这些关系将通过采用公司层级的CG机制(通过机构所有权衡量的所有权结构),并在基于多个理论框架的基础上考虑公司层级的控制变量(例如,公司的规模,增长,盈利能力和杠杆率)来探索。代理和合法性理论的见解。调查结果表明,机构所有权和信用评级之间存在强烈的负相关关系。从描述性分析中可以看出,机构所有者没有很高的信用等级。当评估控制变量时,表明它们对信用等级具有负面影响,包括销售增长和杠杆效应,以及与公司规模,腐败指数,权力距离和英美国家之间的正相关关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    AlHares, Aws; Ntim, Collins;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 21:03:40

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号